1. History and Adoption

 

The Charter has evolved through two main versions:

​

• 1994 Version: The League of Arab States Council first adopted the Charter in 1994. However, it was widely criticized for falling well below international standards and failed to receive a single ratification from any member state.

​

• 2004 Revised Version: A modernized version was adopted at the Arab Summit in Tunis in May 2004. This version successfully secured enough ratifications and entered into force on March 15, 2008.

​

• Purpose: Its preamble reaffirms the principles of the UN Charter and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights while also citing the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam.

​

 

​

2. Key Rights and Provisions

 

The Charter contains a preamble and 53 articles covering civil, political, economic, social, and cultural rights.

 

Civil and Political Rights

 

• Right to Life: Protected in Article 5, though the death penalty is permitted for "most serious crimes."

​

• Legal Protections: Guarantees the right to a fair trial, independence of the judiciary, and the principle of nullum crimen sine lege (no crime without a law).

​

• Prohibition of Torture: Explicitly prohibits physical or psychological torture and inhuman treatment.

​

• Freedom of Expression: Guaranteed but often subject to restrictions based on "national security," "public order," or "public morals."

 

Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights

 

• Right to Development: Emphasizes the right to development as a fundamental human right.

​

• Health and Education: Guarantees the right to health care and free basic education.

​

• Worker Rights: Protects the right to work, fair wages, and the right to form trade unions (within the limits of the law).

 

Distinctive Regional Provisions

 

• Zionism: Uniquely among human rights treaties, the Charter's preamble and Article 2 explicitly condemn "Zionism" as a form of racism and a violation of human rights.

​

• Palestinian Rights: It explicitly affirms the right of peoples to self-determination and resistance against foreign occupation.

​

 

3. Monitoring and Enforcement

 

The Charter establishes a mechanism to monitor state compliance, though it is generally considered weaker than its European or American counterparts.

​

• Arab Human Rights Committee: Established under Article 45, this body consists of 7 independent experts acting in their personal capacity.

  • Function: Its primary role is to review periodic reports submitted by State parties regarding their compliance with the Charter.

  • Limitation: Unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the Committee cannot receive individual complaints (petitions from citizens claiming their rights were violated). It can only issue recommendations and observations based on state reports.

​

• Arab Court of Human Rights: While not part of the Charter itself, a statute to establish an Arab Court of Human Rights was adopted in 2014 to adjudicate state violations. However, it has faced criticism for restricting access only to states (not individuals) and has seen slow ratification.

 

​

4. Criticisms and Controversies

 

Despite being a step forward for the region, the Charter has faced significant criticism from international bodies (including the UN) and NGOs.

Area of ConcernDetails

​

Death Penalty for Minors - The Charter prohibits executing pregnant women but does not explicitly ban the execution of minors (persons under 18) if domestic law allows it.

​

Women's Rights - Article 3 guarantees equality between men and women but includes a qualifier linking it to "positive discrimination established by Islamic Sharia," which critics argue effectively allows national laws to override international equality standards.

​

Freedom of Religion - While it guarantees freedom of thought and belief, it does not explicitly protect the right to change one's religion (apostasy), which is a contentious issue in many member states.

​

Political Incompatibility - High Commissioner for Human Rights Louise Arbour (UN) stated in 2008 that the Charter was incompatible with universal human rights standards, specifically citing the equation of Zionism with racism and the provisions on women and children.