top of page

The American Convention on Human Rights

For the full details of the Convention click the button below

American Convention on Human Rights

The American Convention on Human Rights (ACHR), also known as the Pact of San José or by its Spanish name used in most of the signatory nations, Convención Americana sobre Derechos Humanos, is an international human rights instrument. It was adopted by many countries in the Americas in San JoséCosta Rica, on 22 November 1969. It came into force after the eleventh instrument of ratification (that of Grenada) was deposited on 18 July 1978.

​

The bodies responsible for overseeing compliance with the Convention are the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights and the Inter-American Court of Human Rights, both of which are organs of the Organization of American States (OAS).

​

(Source: Wikipedia)

1. Key Provisions

  • Right to Juridical Personality: The right to be recognized as a person before the law.

​

  • Right to Life: Notably, Article 4 states life is protected "in general, from the moment of conception," which distinguishes it from many other international instruments.

​

  • Right to Humane Treatment: Absolute prohibition of torture and cruel punishment.5

     

  • Personal Liberty: Protection against arbitrary arrest; right to habeas corpus.

​

  • Judicial Guarantees: Right to a fair trial, presumption of innocence, and due process.6

     

  • Freedom of Conscience and Religion.7

     

  • Freedom of Thought and Expression.8

     

Note on Protocol of San Salvador: Because the original Convention focused heavily on civil/political rights, an Additional Protocol (San Salvador, 1988) was created to specifically protect economic, social, and cultural rights, such as the right to work, health, and education.9

 

 

2. The Enforcement Bodies (The "Two Pillars")

 

The Convention establishes two distinct bodies to supervise compliance.10 Understanding the difference between them is crucial to understanding the system.

​

Inter-American Commission (IACHR)

Is Located in Washington DC, it is a Quasi-judicial body and acts as a prosecutor and investigator.

​

It receives complaints from individuals and other state parties. it investigates, attempts friendly settlements and issues recommendations

​

​

Inter-American Court (IACtHR)

is located in San Jose Costs Rica is a Judicial body and issues binding legal judgements

​

Individuals can not access the court, it receives cases referred to it from the commission or state parties. It can order reparations and legal changes

​

 

3. How the Process Works

 

For an individual to seek justice under the Convention, they generally follow this path:

​

  1. Exhaustion of Domestic Remedies: The individual must first try to solve the issue using the courts within their own country. The Convention is a mechanism of "last resort."

  2. Petition to the Commission: If local justice fails, the individual files a complaint with the IACHR in Washington.11

  3. Admissibility & Merits: The Commission decides if the case is valid. If so, they issue a report with recommendations to the State.12

  4. Referral to Court: If the State does not comply with the Commission's recommendations, the Commission (or the State involved) may refer the case to the Inter-American Court.

  5. Judgment: The Court issues a final verdict. If the State is found guilty, it must provide reparations (compensation, changing laws, public apologies, etc.).

 

4. Geopolitical Context and Challenges

 

The Convention has been highly influential, particularly in transitioning Latin American countries from dictatorships to democracies, overturning amnesty laws for war crimes, and protecting indigenous land rights.

 

Membership Nuances:

  • Ratified: Most Latin American nations (e.g., Argentina, Brazil, Mexico, Colombia, Costa Rica).

  • Signed but not Ratified: The United States and Canada signed the Convention but never ratified it. Therefore, they are subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission (under the OAS Charter) but not the binding jurisdiction of the Court.

  • Denunciations: Venezuela and Trinidad & Tobago famously denounced (withdrew from) the Convention, arguing it infringed on national sovereignty.

bottom of page